Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Hunter Henry is not (yet) Jason Witten

Ok, I know everyone loves comparing a potential NFL recruit to a time-tested one.  I get the comparisons between Jason Witten and Hunter Henry.  They were both durable, both SEC tight ends, and both had very similar combine/pro-day numbers.

The trouble is their size: Witten was an inch taller and 15 lbs heavier than Henry.  That's a big difference in weight!  According to the statistical model used in predicting tight-end pro-bowl status (recently featured on FootballOutsiders), Henry is unlikely to earn the honor at his current weight:

Name Hgt Wgt Dash Vert Hgt+Vert Wgt/Dash P(ProBowl)
Hunter Henry 77 250 4.67 31.5 108.5 53.5 2.1%
Jason Witten 78 264 4.65 31 109 56.8 11.8%

According to the retrospective analysis of combine tight ends from 1999-2011 that was conducted previously, 6% probability is the optimal number for predicting pro-bowl appearance.  This 6% was somewhat validated in the cohort of 2011-2013 tight-end combine participants, with Kelce (12.8%) and Eifert (6.6%) both making pro-bowls recently.  

Modifying Henry's weight suggest he would need to put on 10 lbs (preferably of muscle to avoid sacrificing his 40 time or vertical leap) to achieve this 6% according to the aforementioned model.  This isn't saying Henry can't be a pro-bowl tight end, I'm just saying he still may have some work in the weight room before he has the mass required to compete in the NFL as a tight-end.

2 comments:

  1. dude put up 20+ reps at his pro day he'll be fine

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you're suggested that his lighter build won't be an issue when it comes to blocking. However, pro-bowl selection usually depends on yardage and touchdowns. As such, it's not surprising that bench wasn't a significant factor in predicting pro-bowl status. However, weight may have a lot to do with total yards a tight-end can manage, as it may affect yards after contact.

    ReplyDelete